= CCR coordinators virtual meeting 2017-10-20=
----

* When? 
 * 20 October 2017, 10.00 - 11.30 CEST (on basis of [https://doodle.com/poll/2dncp5snipxx5ixc doodle])
* Where?
 * Google Hangouts: [https://hangouts.google.com/call/CFdSqi1Su8b80ZVj9QzcAAEI]

== Documents ==
 - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FWvFHFremlOczJrTBUqUNp1dGcv6AB8G2zkLhR7-o74 color concept set]
 - [https://beta.doodle.com/poll/9fw6ktit7fzrvt4g vote on color concept set definitions]
 - [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nVIbCXiQX0Hmf_167hqNCNJBMc4xMi2axrSRjDSEPvc/edit#gid=0 VLO concept set]

== Agenda ==

 * discuss result of the color concept set votes, and how to continue
 * discuss the procedure for approving concepts
 * discuss next concept sets:
   * bit rate concept
   * VLO facet concepts 

== Notes ==

 * discuss result of the color concept set votes, and how to continue
   * the voting procedure went fine, but we miss too much votes (DK and BG haven't voted) to make a decision
   * ''action'': [Menzo and Ineke] extend the vote and contact coordinators from DK and BG to still vote
 * discuss the procedure for approving concepts
   * requiring a 70% positive of all countries might hinder progress too much
   * maybe require 70% or 80% participation, followed by 70% positive votes
     * 0.7 x 11 = 7.7 x 0.7 = 5.39, taking the ceiling gives 6, i.e. a small majority of coordinators
     * 0.8 x 11 = 8.8 x 0.7 = 6.16, rounding/ceiling gives 6 or 7
   * ''action'': [Menzo and Ineke] write down the procedure in the [[https://www.overleaf.com/read/pxnsftbcphhb|CCR Guidelines]], and ask feedback
 * discuss bit rate concept
   * maybe the existing [[http://hdl.handle.net/11459/CCR_C-2684_ac8bdf07-61be-d478-53f7-8949139e11fc|bit depth]] concept is already ok?
   * ''action'': [Susanne] will discuss with Denis Arnold to come to a proposal spreadsheet
 * discuss VLO facet concepts
   * looked around in the latest state of the [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nVIbCXiQX0Hmf_167hqNCNJBMc4xMi2axrSRjDSEPvc/edit#gid=0|VLO facet concepts spreadsheet]]
     * ''action'': [all] (re)familiarize yourself with the concepts and comments
   * discussion keeps returning to generic concepts versus specific concepts, i.e., with context build in (e.g., ''language'' vs ''resource language'')
     * ''action'': [all] experiment using composition of generic concepts to construct the semantic context for the VLO facets
       * example for the ''language'' VLO facet:
         - ''resource''
           - ''language''
             - ''identifier'' or
             - ''name''
 * other
   * positive experience with using Doodle for voting
   * maybe put the CCR guidelines on Google Doc?
   * format meetings pages as the CMDI TF does, i.e., like this one
   * next meeting in the week of 6 November
   
== action list ==

* [Menzo and Ineke] extend the vote and contact coordinators from DK and BG to still vote
  * [Lina and Petya] vote at [[https://beta.doodle.com/poll/9fw6ktit7fzrvt4g|doodle]]
* [Menzo and Ineke] write down the procedure in the [[https://www.overleaf.com/read/pxnsftbcphhb|CCR Guidelines]], and ask feedback
* [Susanne] discuss the bit rate concept with Denis Arnold
* [all] (re)familiarize yourself with the [[https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nVIbCXiQX0Hmf_167hqNCNJBMc4xMi2axrSRjDSEPvc/edit#gid=0|VLO facet concepts spreadsheet]]
* experiment using composition of generic concepts to construct the semantic context for the VLO facets
  * [Susanne] create spreadsheet with VLO facets and their tooltips
  * [Matej and Menzo] create semantic contexts for these facets
  * [all] join the experiment if you want to be involved
* [Menzo and Ineke] move, potentially, the CCR Guidelines from Overleaf to Google doc
* [Menzo] restyle meeting pages (like this one)
* [all] think about alternatives for Google Hangout