Changeset 2697


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/13/13 18:07:20 (11 years ago)
Author:
vronk
Message:

various additions

Location:
SMC4LRT/chapters
Files:
5 edited

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed

  • SMC4LRT/chapters/Data.tex

    r2672 r2697  
    11
    22\chapter{Analysis of the data landscape}
    3 
    4 This section gives an overview of existing metadata formats together with a description of their characteristics and their usage
     3\label{ch:data}
     4This section gives an overview of existing standards and formats for metadata and content annotations in the field of Language Resources and Technology together with a description of their characteristics and their respective usage in the projects and initiatives.
    55
    66
    7 \section{Metadata Schemas}
     7\section{Metadata Formats}
    88
    99\subsection{CMD-Framework}
    10 
    11 
    1210
    1311\begin{center}
    … …  
    5250
    5351
    54 \section{Metadata collections}
    5552
    56 META-NET
    57 
    58 \subsection{CMDI}
    59 collections, profiles/Terms, ResourceTypes!
    60 
    61 
    62 \section{Content/Annotation Schemas}
     53\section{Content/Annotation Formats}
    6354
    6455CHILDES, TEI, EAF!
    … …  
    6657Open Annotation Collaboration (OAC)\footnote{\url{http://openannotation.org/}}
    6758
     59[LAF] Linguistic Annotation Framework
    6860
    69 \section{Ontologies, Controlled Vocabularies, Knowledge Organizing Systems}
    7061
     62
     63\section{Ontologies, Controlled Vocabularies, Reference Data, Authority Files}
     64\label{refdata}
     65
     66Based on popular demand, the work on reference data for the SSH-community should cover at least the following dimensions (with tentative denominations of corresponding existing vocabularies):
     67
     68\begin{itemize}
     69\item Data Categories / Concepts - ISOcat
     70\item Languages - ISO-639
     71\item Countries - country codes
     72\item Persons - GND, VIAF
     73\item Organizations - GND, VIAF
     74\item Schlagwörter/Subjects - GND, LCSH
     75\item Resource Typology -
     76\end{itemize}
     77
     78AAT - international Architecture and Arts Thesaurus
     79GND - Gemeinsame Norm Datei
     80GTAA - Gemeenschappelijke Thesaurus Audiovisuele Archieven (Common Thesaurus [for] Audiovisual Archives)
     81VIAF - Virtual International Authority File
     82
     83Other related relevant activities and initiatives
     84
     85A broader collection of related initiatives can be found at the German National Library website:
     86\furl{http://www.dnb.de/DE/Standardisierung/LinksAFS/linksafs_node.html}
     87FRBR - Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records
     88RDA - Resource Description and Access
     89http://metadaten-twr.org/ - Technology Watch Report: Standards in Metadata and Interoperability (last entry from 2011)
     90At MPDL, within the escidoc publication platform there seems to be (work  on) a service (since 2009 !) for controlled vocabularies: \furl{http://colab.mpdl.mpg.de/mediawiki/Control_of_Named_Entities}
     91Entity Authority Tool Set - a web application for recording, editing, using and displaying authority information about entities – developed at the New Zealand Electronic Text Centre (NZETC).
     92http://eats.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
     93
     94
     95\subsection{ISOcat - Data Category Registry}
     96
     97ISO12620
    7198
    7299\subsection{Classification Schemes, Taxonomies }
    … …  
    82109LT-World !?
    83110
     111
     112
     113\section{LRT Metadata Catalogs/Collections}
     114
     115\todo{[DFKI/LT-World]  - collection or ontology}
     116
     117\subsection{CMDI}
     118collections, profiles/Terms, ResourceTypes!
     119
     120\subsection{OLAC}
     121
     122\subsection{LAT, TLA}
     123Language Archiving Technology, now The Language Archive - provided by Max Planck Insitute for Psycholinguistics \footnote{\url{http://www.mpi.nl/research/research-projects/language-archiving-technology}}
     124
     125\subsection{META-NET}
     126
     127
     128\subsection{ELRA}
     129
     130\subsection{Other}
     131
     132
     133\begin{description}
     134\item[LDC]  Linguistic Data Consortium
     135\item[OTA LR] Archiving Service provided by Oxford Text Archive \url{http://ota.oucs.ox.ac.uk/}
     136\end{description}
     137
     138\section{Other Metadata Catalogs/Collections}
     139
     140Digital Libraries
     141\subsubsection{(Digital) Libraries}
     142
     143
     144General (Libraries, Federations):
     145
     146\begin{description}
     147\item[OCLC] \url{http://www.oclc.org}
     148    world's biggest Library Federation
     149\item[LoC] Library of Congress \url{http://www.loc.gov}
     150\item[EU-Lib] European Library \url{http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/portal/organisation/handbook/accessing-collections\_ en.htm}
     151\item[europeana] virtual European library - cross-domain portal \url{http://www.europeana.eu/portal/}
     152\end{description}
     153
     154
     155
     156
     157\section{Summary}
     158
     159In this chapter, we gave an overview of the existing formats and dataset in the broad context of Language Resources and Technology
     160

  • SMC4LRT/chapters/Introduction.tex

    r2672 r2697  
     1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     2\chapter{Introduction}
     3\label{ch:intro}
     4%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     5
    16
    27        \begin{itemize}
    … …  
    712                \item structure of the work
    813        \end{itemize}
     14
     15
     16\subsection{Problem statement}
     17
     18While in the Digital Libraries community a consolidation generally already happened and big federated networks of digital libary repository are set up, in the field of Language Resource and Technology the landscape is still scattered, although meanwhile looking back at a decade of standardizing efforts. One main reason seems to be the complexity and diversity of the metadata associated with the resources, stemming for one from the wide range of resource types additionally complicated by dependence of different schools of thought.
     19
     20\todo{Need some number about the disparity in the field, number of institutes, resources, formats.}
     21
     22This situation has been identified by the community and multiple standardization initiatives had been conducted/undertaken. This process seems to have gained a new momentum thanks to large Research Infrastructure Programmes introduced by European Commission, aimed at fostering Research communities developing large-scale pan-european common infrastructures. One key player in this development is the project CLARIN.
    923
    1024
    … …  
    2539Such \textbf{semantic search} functionality requires a preprocessing step, that produces the underlying linkage both between categories/concepts and on the instance level. We refer to this task as \textbf{semantic mapping}, that shall be realized by corresponding \texttt{Semantic Mapping Component}. In this work the focus lies on the method itself -- expressed in the specification and operationalized in the (prototypical) implementation of the component -- rather than trying to establish a final, accomplished alignment. Although a tentative, na\"ive mapping on a subset of the data will be proposed, this will be mainly used for evaluation and shall serve as basis for discussion with domain experts aimed at creating the actual sensible mappings usable for real tasks.
    2640
    27 In fact, due to the great diversity of resources and research tasks, a "final" complete alignment does not seem achievable at all. Therefore also the focus shall be on "soft" dynamic mapping, i.e. to enable the users to adapt the mapping or apply different mappings depending on their current task or research question essentially being able to actively manipulate the recall/precision ratio of the search results. This entails an examination of user interaction with and visualization of the relevant additional information in the user search interface. However this would open doors to a whole new (to this work) field of usability engineering and can be treated here only marginally.
     41In fact, due to the great diversity of resources and research tasks, a ``final'' complete alignment does not seem achievable at all. Therefore also the focus shall be on ``soft'' dynamic mapping, i.e. to enable the users to adapt the mapping or apply different mappings depending on their current task or research question essentially being able to actively manipulate the recall/precision ratio of the search results. This entails an examination of user interaction with and visualization of the relevant additional information in the user search interface. However this would open doors to a whole new (to this work) field of usability engineering and can be treated here only marginally.
    2842
    2943\subsection{Method}
    … …  
    5266
    5367
    54 \begin{itemize}
     68\begin{description}
    5569\item [Specification] definition of the mapping mechanism
    5670\item [Prototype] proof of concept implementation
    5771\item [Evaluation] evaluation results of querying the dataset comparing traditional search and semantic search
    5872\item [LinkedData] translation of the source dataset to RDF-based format with links into existing datasets/ontologies/knowledgebases
    59 
    60 \end{itemize}
     73\end{description}
    6174
    6275

  • SMC4LRT/chapters/Literature.tex

    r2672 r2697  
     1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     2\chapter{State of the Art}
     3\label{ch:lit}
     4%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    15
    2 State of the art / analysis of existing approaches
    3         \begin{itemize}
    4                 \item literature studies
    5                 \item analysis
    6                 \item comparison and summary of existing approaches
    7         \end{itemize}
     6This work is guided by \todo{two (or three? + Infrastructure} main dimensions: the data - in broad, Language Resource and Technology  and the method - Semantic Web technologies. This division is reflected in the following chapter:
    87
     8\section{(Infrastructure for) Language Resources and Technology}
     9In recent years, multiple large-scale initiatives have been set out to combat the fragmented nature of the language resources landscape in general and the metadata interoperability problems in particular.
    910
    10 \subsection*{Infrastructure Components}
    11 In recent years, multiple large-scale initiatives have been set out to combat the fragmented nature of the language resources landscape in general and the metadata interoperability problems in particular. A comprehensive architecture for harmonized handling of metadata -- the Component Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI)\footnote{\url{http://www.clarin.eu/cmdi}} \cite{Broeder+2011} -- is being implemented within the CLARIN project\footnote{\url{http://clarin.eu}}. This service-oriented architecture consisting of a number of interacting software modules allows metadata creation and provision based on a flexible meta model, the \emph{Component Metadata Framework}, that facilitates creation of customized metadata schemas -- acknowledging that no one metadata schema can cover the large variety of language resources and usage scenarios -- however at the same time equipped with well-defined methods to ground their semantic interpretation in a community-wide controlled vocabulary -- the data category registry \cite{Kemps-Snijders2009,Broeder2010}.
    12 
    13 Individual components of this infrastructure will be described in more detail in the section \ref{components}.
    14 
    15 
    16 \subsection*{LRT  Resources}
    1711The CLARIN project also delivers a valuable source of information on the normative resources in the domain in its current deliverable on \textit{Interoperability and Standards} \cite{CLARIN_D5.C-3}. Next to covering ontologies as one type of resources this document offers an exhaustive collection of references to standards, vocabularies and other normative/standardization work in the field of Language Resources and Technology.
    1812
    1913Regarding existing domain-specific semantic resources \texttt{LT-World}\footnote{\url{http://www.lt-world.org/}},  the ontology-based portal covering primarily Language Technology being developed at DFKI\footnote{\textit{Deutsches Forschungszentrum fÃŒr KÃŒnstliche Intelligenz} - \url{http://www.dfki.de}},  is a prominent resource providing information about the entities (Institutions, Persons, Projects, Tools, etc.) in this field of study. \cite{Joerg2010}
     14Chapter \ref{ch:data} examines the field of LRT in more detail.
    2015
    21 \subsection*{Ontology Mapping}
     16\subsection{Metadata}
     17A comprehensive architecture for harmonized handling of metadata -- the Component Metadata Infrastructure (CMDI)\footnote{\url{http://www.clarin.eu/cmdi}} \cite{Broeder+2011} -- is being implemented within the CLARIN project\footnote{\url{http://clarin.eu}}. This service-oriented architecture consisting of a number of interacting software modules allows metadata creation and provision based on a flexible meta model, the \emph{Component Metadata Framework}, that facilitates creation of customized metadata schemas -- acknowledging that no one metadata schema can cover the large variety of language resources and usage scenarios -- however at the same time equipped with well-defined methods to ground their semantic interpretation in a community-wide controlled vocabulary -- the data category registry \cite{Kemps-Snijders2009,Broeder2010}.
     18
     19Individual components of this infrastructure will be described in more detail in the section \ref{ch:components}.
     20
     21
     22\subsection{Content Repositories}
     23Metadata is only one aspect of the availability of resources. It is the first step to announce and describe the resources. However it is of little value, if the resources themselves are not equally well accessible. Thus another pillar of the CLARIN infrastructure are Content Repositories - centres to ensure availability of resources.
     24In the following a few well established repositories are mentioned and described, as well as some of the new repositories being set up in the context of CLARIN.
     25
     26\begin{description}
     27\item[PHAIDRA] Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets, provided by Vienna University \footnote{\url{https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/}}
     28\item[eSciDoc]  provided by MPG + FIZ Karlsruhe \footnote{\url{https://www.escidoc.org/}}
     29\item[DRIVER] pan-European infrastructure of Digital Repositories \footnote{\url{http://www.driver-repository.eu/}}
     30\item[OpenAIRE] - Open Acces Infrastructure for Research in Europe \footnote{\url{http://www.openaire.eu/}}
     31\end{description}
     32
     33\subsection{Content/Corpus Search}
     34Corpus Search Systems
     35\begin{description}
     36\item[DDC]  - text-corpus
     37\item[manatee] - text-corpus
     38\item[CQP] - text-corps
     39\item[TROVA] - MM annotated resources
     40\item[ELAN] - MM annotated resources (editor + search)
     41\end{description}
     42
     43\subsection{FederatedSearch}
     44
     45
     46
     47\section{Semantic Web}
     48
     49\todo{cite TimBL}
     50
     51\begin{description}
     52\item[RDF/OWL]
     53\item[SKOS]
     54\end{description}
     55
     56
     57\subsection{Linked Open Data}
     58As described previously, one outcome of the work will be the dataset expressed in RDF interlinked with other semantic resources.
     59This is very much in line with the broad \textit{Linked Open Data} effort as proposed by Berners-Lee \cite{TimBL2006} and being pursuit across many discplines. (This topic is supported also by the EU Commission within the FP7.\footnote{\url{http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=PROJ\_ICT&ACTION=D&CAT=PROJ&RCN=95562}}) A very recent comprehensive overview of the principles of Linked Data and current applications is the book by Heath and Bizer \cite{HeathBizer2011}, that shall serve as a practical guide for this specific task.
     60
     61
     62\subsection{Schema / Ontology Mapping}
    2263As the main contribution shall be the application of \emph{ontology mapping} techniques and technology, a comprehensive overview of this field and current developments is paramount. There seems to be a plethora of work on the topic and the difficult task will be to sort out the relevant contributions. The starting point for the investigation will be the overview of the field by Kalfoglou \cite{Kalfoglou2003} and a more recent summary of the key challenges by Shvaiko and Euzenat \cite{Shvaiko2008}.
    2364
    … …  
    2667One more specific recent inspirative work is that of Noah et. al \cite{Noah2010} developing a semantic digital library for an academic institution. The scope is limited to document collections, but nevertheless many aspects seem very relevant for this work, like operating on document metadata, ontology population or sophisticated querying and searching.
    2768
    28 \subsection*{Linked Open Data}
    29 As described previously one outcome of the work will be the dataset expressed in RDF interlinked with other semantic resources.
    30 This is very much in line with the broad \textit{Linked Open Data} effort as proposed by Berners-Lee \cite{TimBL2006} and being pursuit across many discplines. (This topic is supported also by the EU Commission within the FP7.\footnote{\url{http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=PROJ\_ICT&ACTION=D&CAT=PROJ&RCN=95562}}) A very recent comprehensive overview of the principles of Linked Data and current applications is the book by Heath and Bizer \cite{HeathBizer2011}, that shall serve as a practical guide for this specific task.
     69\subsection{Ontology Visualization}
    3170
    32 ----------------------------
    3371
    34 \subsection{Language Resources and Technology}
    35 
    36 While in the Digital Libraries community a consolidation generally already happened and big federated networks of digital libary repository are set up, in the field of Language Resource and Technology the landscape is still scattered, although meanwhile looking back at a decade of standardizing efforts. One main reason seems to be the complexity and diversity of the metadata associated with the resources, stemming for one from the wide range of resource types additionally complicated by dependence of different schools of thought.
    37 
    38 Need some number about the disparity in the field, number of institutes, resources, formats.
    39 
    40 This situation has been identified by the community and multiple standardization initiatives had been conducted/undertaken. This process seems to have gained a new momentum thanks to large Research Infrastructure Programmes introduced by European Commission, aimed at fostering Research communities developing large-scale pan-european common infrastructures. One key player in this development is the project CLARIN.
    41 
    42 \subsubsection{CLARIN}
    43 
    44 CLARIN - Common Language Resource and Technology Infrastructure - constituted by over 180 members from round 38 countries. The mission of this project is
    45 
    46     create a research infrastructure that makes language resources and technologies (LRT) available to scholars of all disciplines, especially SSH large-scale pan-European collaborative effort to create, coordinate and make language resources and technology available and readily useable
    47 
    48 This shall be accomplished by setting up a federated network of centers (with federated identity management) but mainly providing resources and services in an agreed upon / coherent / uniform / consistent /standardized manner. The foundation for this goal shall be the Common or Component Metadata infrastructure, a model that caters for flexible metadata profiles, allowing to accomodate existing schemas.
    49 
    50 The embedment in the CLARIN project brings about the context of Language Resources and HLT (Human Language Technology, aka NLP - Natural Language Processing) and SSH (Social Sciences and Humanities) as the primary target user-group of CLARIN.
    51 CLARIN/NLP for SSH
    52 
    53 \subsubsection{Standards}
    54 
    55 \begin{description}
    56 \item[ISO12620] Data Category Registry
    57 \item[LAF] Linguistic Annotation Framework
    58 \item[CMDI] - (DC, OLAC, IMDI, TEI)
    59 \end{description}
    60 
    61 \subsubsection{NLP MD Catalogues}
    62 
    63 \begin{description}
    64 \item[LAT, TLA] - Language Archiving Technology, now The Language Archive - provided by Max Planck Insitute for Psycholinguistics \url{http://www.mpi.nl/research/research-projects/language-archiving-technology}
    65 \item[OTA LR] Archiving Service provided by Oxford Text Archive \url{http://ota.oucs.ox.ac.uk/}
    66 \item[OLAC]
    67 \item[ELRA]
    68 \item[LDC]
    69 \item[DFKI/LT-World]
    70 \end{description}
    71 
    72 \subsection{Ontologies}
    73 
    74 \subsubsection{Word, Sense, Concept}
    75 
    76 Lexicon vs. Ontology
    77 Lexicon is a linguistic object an ontology is not.\cite{Hirst2009} We don't need to be that strict, but it shall be a guiding principle in this work to consider things (Datasets, Vocabularies, Resources) also along this dichotomy/polarity: Conceptual vs. Lexical.
    78 And while every Ontology has to have a lexical representation (canonically: rdfs:label, rdfs:comment, skos:*label), if we don't try to force observed objects into a binary classification, but consider a bias spectrum, we should be able to locate these along this spectrum.
    79 So the main focus of a typical ontology are the concepts ("conceptualization"), primarily language-independent.
     72\subsection{Linguistic Ontologies}
    8073
    8174A special case are Linguistic Ontologies: isocat, GOLD, WALS.info
    8275ontologies conceptualizing the linguistic domain
    8376
    84 They are special in that ("ontologized") Lexicons refer to them to describe linguistic properties of the Lexical Entries, as opposed to linking to Domain Ontologies to anchor Senses/Meanings.
     77They are special in that (``ontologized'') Lexicons refer to them to describe linguistic properties of the Lexical Entries, as opposed to linking to Domain Ontologies to anchor Senses/Meanings.
    8578Lexicalized Ontologies: LingInfo, lemon: LMF +  isocat/GOLD +  Domain Ontology
    8679
    … …  
    9689And we are dealing with highly structured data with referenced in their nominal(?) form.
    9790
    98 Another special case are Controlled Vocabularies or Taxonomies/Classification Systems, let alone folksonomies, in that they identify terms and concepts/meanings, ie there is no explicit mapping between the language represenation and the concept, but rather the term is implicit carrier of the meaning/concept.
    99 So for example in the LCSH the surface realization of each subject-heading at the same time identifies the Concept ~.
    100 
    101 controlled vocabularies?
    10291
    10392
    104 
    105 \subsubsection{Semantic Web - Linked Data}
    106 
    107 \begin{description}
    108 \item[RDF/OWL]
    109 \item[SKOS]
    110 \end{description}
    111 
    112 \subsubsection{OntologyMapping}
    113 
    114 
    115 \subsection{Visualization}
    116 
    117 
    118 \subsection{FederatedSearch}
    119 
    120 \subsubsection{Standards}
    121 
    122 \begin{description}
    123 \item[Z39.50/SRU/SRW/CQL] LoC
    124 \item[OAI-PMH]
    125 \end{description}
    126 
    127 
    128 \subsubsection{(Digital) Libraries}
    129 
    130 
    131 General (Libraries, Federations):
    132 
    133 \begin{description}
    134 \item[OCLC] \url{http://www.oclc.org}
    135     world's biggest Library Federation
    136 \item[LoC] Library of Congress \url{http://www.loc.gov}
    137 \item[EU-Lib] European Library \url{http://www.theeuropeanlibrary.org/portal/organisation/handbook/accessing-collections\_ en.htm}
    138 \item[europeana] virtual European library - cross-domain portal \url{http://www.europeana.eu/portal/}
    139 \end{description}
    140 
    141 \subsubsection{Content Repositories}
    142 
    143 \begin{description}
    144 \item[PHAIDRA] Permanent Hosting, Archiving and Indexing of Digital Resources and Assets, provided by Vienna University \url{https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/}
    145 \item[eSciDoc]  provided by MPG + FIZ Karlsruhe \url{https://www.escidoc.org/}
    146 \item[DRIVER] pan-European infrastructure of Digital Repositories \url{http://www.driver-repository.eu/}
    147 \item[OpenAIRE] - Open Acces Infrastructure for Research in Europe \url{http://www.openaire.eu/}
    148 \end{description}
    149 
    150 
    151 \subsubsection{(MD)search frameworks:}
    152 
    153 \begin{description}
    154 \item[Zebra/Z39.50] JZKit
    155 \item[Lucene/Solr]
    156 \item[eXist] - xml DB
    157 \end{description}
    158 
    159 \subsubsection{Content/Corpus Search}
    160 Corpus Search Systems
    161 \begin{description}
    162 \item[DDC]  - text-corpus
    163 \item[manatee] - text-corpus
    164 \item[CQP] - text-corps
    165 \item[TROVA] - MM annotated resources
    166 \item[ELAN] - MM annotated resources (editor + search)
    167 \end{description}
    168 
    169 \subsection{Summary}
    170 
     93\section{Summary}
     94This chapter concentrated on the current affairs/developments regarding the infrastructures for Language Resources and Technology and
     95on the other hand gave an overview of the state of the art regarding methods to be applied in this work: Semantic Web Technologies, Ontology Mapping and Ontology Visualization.

  • SMC4LRT/chapters/System.tex

    r2672 r2697  
    1 %\section{?? System}
    2 %SOA?
     1%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
     2\chapter{Implementation}
     3%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
    34
    45
    5 %\subsection{Query Language}
    6 %CQL?
     6
     7The core function of the SMC is implemented as a set of XSL-stylesheets, with auxiliary functionality (like caching or a wrapping web service) being provided by a wrapping application implemented in Java. There is also a plan to provide an XQuery implementation. The SMC module is being maintained in the CMDI code repository\footnote {\url{http://svn.clarin.eu/SMC}}.
     8
     9The Semantic Mapping module is based on the DCR and CMD framework and is being developed as a separate service on the side of CLARIN  Metadata Service, its primary consuming service, but shall be equally usable by other applications.
    710
    811
    9 \subsection{Implementation}
     12\section{Initialization}
    1013
    11 The core function of the SMC is being implemented as a set of XSL-stylesheets, with auxiliary functionality (like caching or a wrapping web service) being provided by a wrapping application implemented in Java. There is also a plan to provide an XQuery implementation. The SMC module is being maintained in the CMDI code repository\footnote {\url{http://svn.clarin.eu/SMC}}.
     14First there is an initialization phase, in which the application fetches the information from the source modules (cf. \ref{components}). All profiles and components from the Component Registry are read and all the URIs to data categories are extracted to construct an inverted map of data categories:
     15\newline
     16
     17\textit{datcatURI $\mapsto$ profile.component.element[]}
     18\newline
     19
     20The collected data categories are enriched with information from corresponding registries (DCRs), adding the verbose identifier, the description and available translations into other working languages. %, usable as base for multi-lingual search user-interface.
     21
     22Finally relation sets defined in the Relation Registry are fetched and matched with the data categories in the map to create sets of semantically equivalent (or otherwise related) data categories.
    1223
    1324
    14 \subsubsection{smc init}
     25\section{SMC as module for Metadata Repository}
     26
     27(MD)search frameworks:
     28
     29\begin{description}
     30\item[Zebra/Z39.50] JZKit
     31\item[Lucene/Solr]
     32\item[eXist] - xml DB
     33\end{description}
    1534
    1635
    17 \subsubsection{smc browser}
     36
     37\section{SMC Browser}
    1838
    1939Explore the Component Metadata Framework
    … …  
    3555\end{figure*}
    3656
    37 \subsubsection{smc as mdrepo module}
    3857
    3958
    40 \subsubsection{smc as VAS}
     59\section{User Interface}
    4160
     61\subsection{Query Input}
    4262
     63\subsection{Columns}
    4364
    44 \subsection{User Interface}
     65\subsection{Summaries}
    4566
    46 \subsubsection{Query Input}
    47 
    48 \subsubsection{Columns}
    49 
    50 \subsubsection{Summaries}
    51 
    52 \subsubsection{Differential Views}
     67\subsection{Differential Views}
    5368Visualize impact of given mapping in terms of covered dataset (number of matched records).
    5469
     70\subsection{Visualization}
     71Landscape, Treemap, SOM
     72
     73Ontology Mapping and Alignement / saiks/Ontology4 4auf1.pdf

  • SMC4LRT/chapters/acknowledgements.tex

    r2672 r2697  
    11\chapter*{Acknowledgements}
    22
    3 Optional acknowledgements may be inserted here.
     3I would like to thank all the colleagues from the CLARIN community, for the support, the fruitful discussions and helpful feedback, especially Daan Broeder, Menzo Windhouwer, Marc Kemps-Snijders, Hennie Brugman.
     4
     5With love to em.
Note: See TracChangeset for help on using the changeset viewer.