Changes between Version 11 and Version 12 of Cmdi/QualityCriteria


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/11/15 14:18:14 (9 years ago)
Author:
matej.durco@oeaw.ac.at
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Cmdi/QualityCriteria

    v11 v12  
    4747  * link to a LandingPage when available?
    4848  * is there an indication of the mime type?
    49   * ResourceProxy with @type=Resource or @type=Metadata available?
     49  * ResourceProxy with `@type=Resource or @type=Metadata` available?
    5050* URL-inspection - broken links
    5151  * in MdSelfLink
     
    5656  - what about files that hardly contain any information?
    5757  - completeness concerning relative importance
    58 * size? - e.g. overall size (measured in characters)
    59   * is the file too big to be useful? [[BR]]
     58* size - e.g. overall size (measured in MB)
     59  * is the file too big to be useful? (VLO has strong rule on max size) [[BR]]
    6060    -> suggest higher granularity)
     61  * max number of !ResourceProxy per record
     62
     63* timeliness metrics - how quality changes in time?
     64
     65
     66soft:
     67* values conform to a controlled vocabulary (where applicable)
    6168* number of elements
    6269* Length of the strings in description fields
    6370* what is the information entropy? (lots of very similar files might be an indication of a suboptimal modelling)
    6471
    65 * accuracy - semantic distance between data and md?
    66 * conformance to expectation metrics?
    67 * coherence - different metadata fields describe the same object in the same way?
    68 * accessibility metrics - retrieval and cognitive)?
    69 
    70 * timeliness metrics - how quality changes in time?
    71 
    72 soft:
    73 * values conform to a controlled vocabulary (where applicable)
    7472
    7573problematic:
     
    7775* ? editing quality: typos, expected format(date, capitalization, pl vs sing)
    7876* the combination of values in a related categorical fields is not consistent (if field A has value x, field B should have y or z)
     77
     78interesting, but difficult:
     79* accuracy - semantic distance between data and md?
     80* conformance to expectation metrics?
     81* coherence - different metadata fields describe the same object in the same way?
     82* accessibility metrics - retrieval and cognitive)?
     83  check if you can retrieve the data, or there is login (and shib-login)