Changes between Version 3 and Version 4 of Cmdi/QualityCriteria


Ignore:
Timestamp:
11/06/15 14:56:55 (9 years ago)
Author:
davor.ostojic@oeaw.ac.at
Comment:

compiled Technical report by Marc Kemps-Snijders

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Cmdi/QualityCriteria

    v3 v4  
    4040  * is there a link to a LandingPage when available?
    4141  * is there an indication of the mime type?
    42 * URL-inspection
    43   are the links resolvable / dead-links?
    44   (both links/handles in ResourceProxy and in the components/elements)
    45 * filled-in ratio / sparseness ?
     42* URL-inspection - broken links
     43* filled-in ratio / sparseness?
    4644  - how many of the elements defined by schema are actually populated with information
    4745  - what about files that hardly contain any information?
     46  - completeness concerning relative importance
     47* editing quality: typos, expected format(date, capitalization, pl vs sing)
    4848* values conform to a controlled vocabulary (where applicable)
     49* publication before creation date
     50* the combination of values in a related categorical fields is not consistent (if field A has value x, field B should have y or z)
    4951* size? - e.g. overall size (measured in characters)
    5052  * is the file too big to be useful? [[BR]]
    … …  
    5456* what is the information entropy? (lots of very similar files might be an indication of a suboptimal modelling)
    5557
     58* accuracy - semantic distance between data and md?
     59* conformance to expectation metrics?
     60* coherence - different metadata fields describe the same object in the same way?
     61* accessibility metrics - retrieval and cognitive)?
     62
     63* timeliness metrics - how quality changes in time?
     64
     65