Context Navigation

Changes between Version 19 and Version 20 of DASISH/DiscussionPage

v19	v20
6	6	-- Regarding xml:id. Yes, we know that @ and # are not allowed, that's why I took them out from the id-s in the newest examples. We think that allowing @ and # are not worth efforts on making our own "dasish:id" and checking its uniqueness, etc.
7	7
8		-- Stephanie: "it will not be possible to store multiple binary relations (Appendix I, R(A,B): Implies, Equivalent, Implies the opposite, Contradicts) with one and the same annotation." My personal opinion: I would not like to have multiple relations on the same annotation, it seems a bit messy.
	8	-- Stephanie: "it will not be possible to store multiple binary relations (Appendix I, R(A,B): Implies, Equivalent, Implies the opposite, Contradicts) with one and the same annotation." My personal opinion: I would not like to have multiple relations on the same annotation, it seems a bit messy. However, the core model allows for such a body type so it is primarily up to the client whether this gets supported.
9	9
10	10	-- Stephanie about binary relation "different": "Do you intend to have an expandable list for the binary relations?". My personal opinion: yes, in principle I would like to have such a list. However, we may think on it later on. See the first item above: for now everything can be in the body.