Changes between Version 33 and Version 34 of ServiceProviderFederation
- Timestamp:
- 11/14/16 10:35:21 (8 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
ServiceProviderFederation
v33 v34 58 58 Is there a policy for what should be used as the unique ID? No. 59 59 60 61 60 === SURFconext === 62 61 … … 82 81 === Attribute release === 83 82 84 * [http://www.clarin.eu/page/3578 older overview]85 83 * [https://lindat.mff.cuni.cz/secure/attributes.xml automatically produced, current overview] 84 * [http://www.clarin.eu/page/3578 older (outdated, manually maintained) overview] 86 85 87 86 == Attributes requested by SPF services == 88 87 89 These should be listed in the SAML metadata about the SP .88 These should be listed in the SAML metadata about the SP - see recommendation 8 (attributeconsumingservice) of https://www.clarin.eu/content/guidelines-saml-metadata-about-your-sp 90 89 91 === [[Component Registry]] ===92 93 * strictly required: ePPN94 * nice to have: displayName, cn (common name)95 96 === [[Virtual Collection Registry]] ===97 98 * strictly required: eduPersonTargetedID (could also be configured to work with ePPN)99 * nice to have: cn, displayName100 101 === WebLicht ===102 103 * strictly required: (no attributes - as not all IdPs are releasing anything useful)104 * nice to have:105 106 === TQE (CLARIN-NL, http://hdl.handle.net/1839/00-SERV-0000-0000-0005-6) ===107 108 * strictly required: (no attributes)109 * nice to have: (no attributes)110 111 === Adelheid anntool ((clarin-nl, http://hdl.handle.net/1839/00-SERV-0000-0000-0005-6) ===112 113 * strictly required:114 * nice to have:115