| 18 | | Not yet. |
| | 18 | 0. Welcome |
| | 19 | * New Members from other CLARIN countries. Welcome! |
| | 20 | 1. Query-Languages |
| | 21 | * General consensus to keep on working on FCS-CQP |
| | 22 | * Clarification: Endpoints must not support all of FCS-CQP, errors need to |
| | 23 | be defined by the spec |
| | 24 | * No real option of the task force on sorting and metadata integration; |
| | 25 | maybe to be revisited later again |
| | 26 | * Clarification: Aggregator as SRU service could be interesting, but is |
| | 27 | outside of the scope of the current work |
| | 28 | 2. POS stuff |
| | 29 | * Jörg compiled a comparison table of potential "universal" POS tagsets and |
| | 30 | highlighted some pro and cons |
| | 31 | * In general, the group was agnostic about which tagset to prefer. |
| | 32 | * In contrast to EGALES, it seems like more concrete mappings to other |
| | 33 | tagsets exist for UD-12 |
| | 34 | * We'll do no versioning on tagsets. "Universal" POS for spec version X is defined as a snapshot of the appropriate candidate. Future developments in the "universal" tagset will then (maybe) become part of spec version X+1 |
| | 35 | * To get ahead, the tast force menbers where asked to vote for one candidate. Results are |
| | 36 | * UD-17: 6 (Indrek, Dirk, Jozef, Jens, Hanna, Leif-Jöran) |
| | 37 | * UP-12: 2 (Pavel, Matej) |
| | 38 | * EAGLES: 1 (Jörg) |
| | 39 | * Abstained: 3 (Markus, Emanuel, Oliver) |
| | 40 | So, the majority voted for UD-17. |
| | 41 | 3. !DataView(s) |
| | 42 | * postponed |
