| | 28 | * (3) Discussion about non-linguistic resources within the VLO |
| | 29 | * question, if resources which are not interesting for linguists/which can't be considered linguistic resources should or shouldn't be harvested for the VLO |
| | 30 | * pro: remain open for various resources; facetted search will help the user to select the resources interesting for his/her research question |
| | 31 | * contra: VLO and CLARIN is genuinely focused on linguistic resources; we shouldn't harvest everything that's available but evaluate available metadata records with respect to their usability for linguists |
| | 32 | * result: for the time being the problematic resources should be omitted from the VLO; if such cases re-occur we will resume this discussion |
