Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of VLO-Taskforce/Meeting-2015-01-19


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/20/15 17:13:51 (9 years ago)
Author:
haaf@bbaw.de
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • VLO-Taskforce/Meeting-2015-01-19

    v5 v6  
    55Participants: Thomas Eckart, Peter Fankhauser, Susanne Haaf, Axel Herold, Jörg Knappen, Jens Stegmann
    66* (1) Discussion about the VLO-Facets-Document
    7  * Descriptions for facets 1-8 did not need further discussion
    8  * Facet 9 License separate discussion (cf. below point 2)
     7 * Descriptions for the following facets accepted without further changes: 1 Collection, 3 Country, 5 Format, 6 Genre, 7 Keywords, 8 Language
     8 * Facets which shall be omitted: 2 Continent, 4 Data Provider
     9 * Facet 9 License: separate discussion (cf. below point 2)
    910 * Facet 10 Lifecycle Status: we recommended the vocabulary proposed within [http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-3818 DC-3818]
    1011 * Facet 11 Modality: term "enblematics" is withdrawn from the vocabulary; representatives of the discipline-specific working groups will be asked for their opinion on the proposed vocabulary list (Susanne)
    1112 * Facet 12 National Project: CLARIN-DK or CLARIN-DK-UCPH? --> representatives of CLARIN-DK will be asked for their preference (Susanne)
    12  * Facet 13 Organisation: [http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-6134 DC-6134:publisher] and [http://purl.org/dc/terms/publisher DublinCore:publisher] will be omitted from the list of allowed data categories because of too many false positives (centers may have to adjust their resources here)
     13 * Facet 13 Organisation: Discussion about problematic Data Categories [http://www.isocat.org/datcat/DC-6134 DC-6134:publisher] and [http://purl.org/dc/terms/publisher DublinCore:publisher]: these will be omitted from the list of possible data categories because of too many false positives (centers may have to adjust their resources here)
     14 * Facet 14 Project: Description of recommendations accepted without changes
     15 * Facet 15 Resource Type: Description accepted without changes; proposed vocabulary is not coherent from an ontological point of view but sufficiently suitable and usable from a pragmatic perspective
     16 * Facet 16 Subject: Recommendations on the vocabulary: 1st point is ok to be asked for, 2nd point should be marked "preferable", 3rd point will be omitted
     17 * Facet 17 Temporal Coverage: Description accepted without changes; clarification: points in time (as opposed to time ranges) can be expressed by usage of the time-coverage-DCs and the Open Date Range format
     18 * Susanne will include the named adaptions into the Facet-Recommendations-Document
    1319
    1420* (2) Discussion about Facet 9: License