Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of VLO-Taskforce/Meeting-2015-02-18


Ignore:
Timestamp:
03/12/15 11:14:57 (9 years ago)
Author:
haaf@bbaw.de
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • VLO-Taskforce/Meeting-2015-02-18

    v1 v2  
    44
    55Participants: Peter Fankhauser, Hanna Hedeland, Susanne Haaf, Axel Herold, Thomas Eckart, Jens Stegmann, Matej Durco, Jörg Knappen
    6 * (1) Report Matej about the current state of works within CLARIN's Metadata Curation Taskforce
     6* (1) Report Matej about the current work of CLARIN's Metadata Curation Taskforce
    77 * Main goal: improve the presentation of data within the VLO (at the presentation level)
    88 * "Organisation" facet: Proposal for a mapping of terms onto one another in order to reduce of variants; this mapping has been implemented, but does not lead to 100% correct results, yet
    9  * Basic documents for the MC issue:
    10    1. Paper: Marc Kemps-Snijders: Metadata quality assurance for CLARIN
    11    2. Paper: Thorsten Trippel, Daan Broeder, Matej Durco, Oddrun Pauline Ohren: Towards automatic quality assessment of component metadata. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/summaries/1011.html
     9 * Resources which should be notices/used for the MC issue:
     10   1. Marc Kemps-Snijders: Metadata quality assurance for CLARIN (Paper; will be circulated internally)
     11   2. Thorsten Trippel, Daan Broeder, Matej Durco, Oddrun Pauline Ohren: Towards automatic quality assessment of component metadata. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2014/summaries/1011.html (Paper)
     12   3. Oliver Schonefeld: CMDI validator (Tool) --> Would it be possible to apply this tool in our context and at which cost?
     13   4. Jan Odijk: Discovering Resources in CLARIN: Problems and Suggestions for Solutions. http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/303788/Searching_with_the_VLO.pdf (Paper)
     14   5. CMDI-Taskforce: CMDI Best Practice Guide (Documentation; currently in preparation)
     15 * Questions:
     16  * What would be a feasible permanent QA workflow for the VLO (at every harvest) and how can we get to it?
     17  * What can we (as MC and VLO taskforces) provide to support the implementation of QA mechanisms for the VLO (documentation?, lists of closed vocabularies?, mappings? ... )?
     18* (2) Discussion:
    1219