Opened 12 years ago

Closed 9 years ago

#212 closed enhancement (wontfix)

link to annex web application for EAF files

Reported by: dietuyt Owned by: Twan Goosen
Priority: minor Milestone:
Component: VLO web app Version:
Keywords: Cc: teckart

Change History (12)

comment:1 Changed 12 years ago by herste

Is there a way to distinguish between EAF handle links and other handle links?

comment:2 Changed 12 years ago by dietuyt

Yes, there are 2 options:

  • looking at the mimetype attribute (as mentioned in this ticket)
  • using the handle API, but then ticket:136 needs to be fixed first

comment:3 in reply to:  1 Changed 12 years ago by larlam

Replying to herste:

Is there a way to distinguish between EAF handle links and other handle links?

You can look at the mime type, e.g.

<ResourceProxy id="d203465e1156">

<ResourceType mimetype="text/x-eaf+xml">Resource</ResourceType?>
<ResourceRef>hdl:1839/00-0000-0000-0014-FAC0-4</ResourceRef?>

</ResourceProxy?>

comment:4 Changed 12 years ago by larlam

Damn, Dieter's reply only became visible after I typed mine. This thing should have an auto-refresh.

comment:5 Changed 11 years ago by teckart

Is there any news about the handle parameter for the Annex webviewer?

comment:6 Changed 11 years ago by larlam

Description: modified (diff)

Annex has supported the handle parameter for quite some time now, so there shouldn't be anything external left blocking this feature from being enabled in VLO.

comment:7 Changed 11 years ago by larlam

Owner: changed from herste to keeloo
Status: newassigned

BTW, it would probably help progress if the current VLO maintainer was actually on this ticket.

comment:8 Changed 10 years ago by Twan Goosen

Owner: changed from keeloo to Twan Goosen

Kees Jan no longer works on VLO. Assigning all VLO web app tickets owned by KJ to Twan

comment:9 Changed 10 years ago by herold@bbaw.de

Isn't this a client side problem? PID should be handled all the same, regardless of what they are pointing at (or rather of what the metadata description claims they are pointing at), no?

comment:10 Changed 10 years ago by Twan Goosen

I agree with Axel's comment. A possible solution would be to provide 'raw' and 'view' links for each resources (maybe in an extended resources view, e.g. a table). Some convention has to be used for this though, e.g. appending the "@view" part identifier to the handle (which needs to be supported by the handle server).

If there is consensus about this, replace this with a new and more targeted ticket?

Also see #213

Last edited 10 years ago by Twan Goosen (previous) (diff)

comment:11 Changed 10 years ago by herold@bbaw.de

Twan, that'd be fine with me. Let's give others a few days to comment, though.

comment:12 Changed 9 years ago by Dieter Van Uytvanck

Resolution: wontfix
Status: assignedclosed
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.